Comparison

Confiture de fruits rouges 65% de fruits vs Marmellata Hero frutti di bosco

Overall, Marmellata Hero frutti di bosco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientConfiture de fruits rouges 6...Marmellata Hero frutti di bo...
Nutri-Score d a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 168 kcal 40 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0.1 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0 g
Sugars 38 g 3.2 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 1.9 g 1.7 g
Protein 0.6 g 0.3 g
Additives18
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Marmellata Hero frutti di bosco has 76% fewer calories (40 kcal vs 168 kcal).
  • Marmellata Hero frutti di bosco has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Marmellata Hero frutti di bosco has 92% less sugar (3.2 g vs 38 g).
  • Confiture de fruits rouges 65% de fruits has 50% more protein (0.6 g vs 0.3 g).
  • Marmellata Hero frutti di bosco has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Confiture de fruits rouges 65% de fruits

Sucre, fraise 25%, cassis2%, gélifiant: pectines, jus de citron concentré

Marmellata Hero frutti di bosco

mirtilli, fragole, succo di more da concentrato, lamponi, acqua edulcoranti (sciroppo di sorbitolo, glicosidi steviolici, sucralosio, acesulfame K), succO concentrato di limone, gelificante (pectina), conservante (sorbato di potassio), stabilizzante (cloruro di calcio).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Confiture de fruits rouges 65% de fruits or Marmellata Hero frutti di bosco?

Overall, Marmellata Hero frutti di bosco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Marmellata Hero frutti di bosco has fewer calories: 40 kcal versus 168 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Marmellata Hero frutti di bosco has less sugar: 3.2 g versus 38 g per 100 g.

More comparisons