Comparison

Compotée fruits rouges vs Rhubarbe morceaux fondants

Overall, Compotée fruits rouges has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCompotée fruits rougesRhubarbe morceaux fondants
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 91 kcal 89 kcal
Fat 0.4 g 0.2 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 19 g 19 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 2.8 g 2 g
Protein 0.7 g 0.6 g
Additives11
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Compotée fruits rouges has 29% more fiber (2.8 g vs 2 g).
  • Compotée fruits rouges has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Rhubarbe morceaux fondants is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Compotée fruits rouges

Fruits (fraises 48%, cerises 25%, groseilles 7%, cassis 5%), sucre, jus de citrons concentré, jus concentré d'acérola, gélifiant: pectines de fruits, concentré de carottes. Peut contenir des noyaux.

Rhubarbe morceaux fondants

Rhubarbe 80%, sucre, antioxydant : acide ascorbique.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Compotée fruits rouges or Rhubarbe morceaux fondants?

Overall, Compotée fruits rouges has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rhubarbe morceaux fondants has fewer calories: 89 kcal versus 91 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Compotée fruits rouges has less sugar: 19 g versus 19 g per 100 g.

More comparisons