Comparison

Compote de pommes allégée en sucres* vs Compote pommes allégée en sucres

Overall, Compote de pommes allégée en sucres* has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCompote de pommes allégée en...Compote pommes allégée en su...
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 61 kcal 71 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 14 g 16 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 1.8 g 2.2 g
Protein 0 g 0.2 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedNone

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Compote de pommes allégée en sucres* has 14% fewer calories (61 kcal vs 71 kcal).
  • Compote de pommes allégée en sucres* has 13% less sugar (14 g vs 16 g).
  • Compote pommes allégée en sucres has 18% more fiber (2.2 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Only Compote pommes allégée en sucres lists: None.

Ingredients

Compote de pommes allégée en sucres*

Pommes 94%, sucre.

Compote pommes allégée en sucres

97% pommes, sucre, acidifiant: acide citrique; antioxydant: acide ascorbique.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Compote de pommes allégée en sucres* or Compote pommes allégée en sucres?

Overall, Compote de pommes allégée en sucres* has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Compote de pommes allégée en sucres* has fewer calories: 61 kcal versus 71 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Compote de pommes allégée en sucres* has less sugar: 14 g versus 16 g per 100 g.

More comparisons