Pommes morceaux fondants vs Compote de pommes allégée en sucres*
Overall, Compote de pommes allégée en sucres* has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Pommes morceaux fondants
Compote de pommes allégée en sucres*
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pommes morceaux fondants | Compote de pommes allégée en... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 73 kcal | 61 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 16 g | 14 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Compote de pommes allégée en sucres* has 16% fewer calories (61 kcal vs 73 kcal).
- Compote de pommes allégée en sucres* has 13% less sugar (14 g vs 16 g).
- Compote de pommes allégée en sucres* has 28% more fiber (1.8 g vs 1.3 g).
Ingredients
Pommes morceaux fondants
Pommes 92%, sucre, antioxydant: acide ascorbique.
Compote de pommes allégée en sucres*
Pommes 94%, sucre.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pommes morceaux fondants or Compote de pommes allégée en sucres*?
Overall, Compote de pommes allégée en sucres* has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Compote de pommes allégée en sucres* has fewer calories: 61 kcal versus 73 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Compote de pommes allégée en sucres* has less sugar: 14 g versus 16 g per 100 g.