Pommes morceaux fondants vs Compote pommes allégée en sucres
Overall, Compote pommes allégée en sucres has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Pommes morceaux fondants
Compote pommes allégée en sucres
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pommes morceaux fondants | Compote pommes allégée en su... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 73 kcal | 71 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 16 g | 16 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 2.2 g |
| Protein | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Compote pommes allégée en sucres has 41% more fiber (2.2 g vs 1.3 g).
- Only Compote pommes allégée en sucres lists: None.
Ingredients
Pommes morceaux fondants
Pommes 92%, sucre, antioxydant: acide ascorbique.
Compote pommes allégée en sucres
97% pommes, sucre, acidifiant: acide citrique; antioxydant: acide ascorbique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pommes morceaux fondants or Compote pommes allégée en sucres?
Overall, Compote pommes allégée en sucres has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Compote pommes allégée en sucres has fewer calories: 71 kcal versus 73 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pommes morceaux fondants has less sugar: 16 g versus 16 g per 100 g.