Comparison

Compote Bio Pommes et Coings vs Compote pomme coing

Overall, Compote pomme coing has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCompote Bio Pommes et CoingsCompote pomme coing
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 3 1
Calories 69 kcal 43 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0 g
Sugars 13.1 g 10 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 1.9 g 1.5 g
Protein 0.3 g 0.5 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Compote pomme coing has 38% fewer calories (43 kcal vs 69 kcal).
  • Compote pomme coing has 24% less sugar (10 g vs 13.1 g).
  • Compote Bio Pommes et Coings has 24% more fiber (1.9 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Compote pomme coing is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Compote Bio Pommes et Coings

Purée de pommes* 76%, purée de coings* 20%, sucre de canne roux 4%, antioxydant : acide ascorbique. *Issus de l'agriculture biologique.

Compote pomme coing

Purée de pommes* 71,9 %, purée de coings* 28 %, acide ascorbique.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Compote Bio Pommes et Coings or Compote pomme coing?

Overall, Compote pomme coing has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Compote pomme coing has fewer calories: 43 kcal versus 69 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Compote pomme coing has less sugar: 10 g versus 13.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons