Comparison
Coles de Bruselas vs Rosenkohl lila
Overall, Coles de Bruselas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coles de Bruselas | Rosenkohl lila |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 45 kcal | 50 kcal |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 4.5 g | 4 g |
| Protein | 2.3 g | 4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Coles de Bruselas has 36% less sugar (1.4 g vs 2.2 g).
- Coles de Bruselas has 12% more fiber (4.5 g vs 4 g).
- Rosenkohl lila has 42% more protein (4 g vs 2.3 g).
Ingredients
Coles de Bruselas
Coles de Bruselas.
Rosenkohl lila
Rosenkohl
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coles de Bruselas or Rosenkohl lila?
Overall, Coles de Bruselas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Coles de Bruselas has fewer calories: 45 kcal versus 50 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Coles de Bruselas has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Brussels Bites Kit. Garl... vs Rosenkohl lila
Coles de Bruselas vs Rosenkohl lila
Choux de Bruxelles vs Coles de Bruselas
Col de Bruselas vs Coles de Bruselas
Coles de Bruselas vs Coles de Bruselas
Brussels Bites Kit. Garl... vs Coles de Bruselas
Coles de Bruselas vs Coles de Bruselas
Brussels Sprouts with ba... vs Rosenkohl lila