Comparison

Col de Bruselas vs Coles de Bruselas

Overall, Coles de Bruselas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCol de BruselasColes de Bruselas
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 50 kcal 45 kcal
Fat 0.4 g 0.7 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 2.2 g 1.4 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 4 g 4.5 g
Protein 4 g 2.3 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Coles de Bruselas has 36% less sugar (1.4 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Coles de Bruselas has 12% more fiber (4.5 g vs 4 g).
  • Col de Bruselas has 42% more protein (4 g vs 2.3 g).

Ingredients

Col de Bruselas

Coles de Bruselas. Categoría I.

Coles de Bruselas

Coles de Bruselas.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Col de Bruselas or Coles de Bruselas?

Overall, Coles de Bruselas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Coles de Bruselas has fewer calories: 45 kcal versus 50 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Coles de Bruselas has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons