Col de Bruselas vs Coles de Bruselas
Overall, Coles de Bruselas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Col de Bruselas | Coles de Bruselas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 50 kcal | 45 kcal |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 0.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 1.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 4 g | 4.5 g |
| Protein | 4 g | 2.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Coles de Bruselas has 36% less sugar (1.4 g vs 2.2 g).
- Coles de Bruselas has 12% more fiber (4.5 g vs 4 g).
- Col de Bruselas has 42% more protein (4 g vs 2.3 g).
Ingredients
Col de Bruselas
Coles de Bruselas. Categoría I.
Coles de Bruselas
Coles de Bruselas.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Col de Bruselas or Coles de Bruselas?
Overall, Coles de Bruselas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Coles de Bruselas has fewer calories: 45 kcal versus 50 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Coles de Bruselas has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.