Comparison
Col de Bruselas vs Coles de Bruselas
Overall, Col de Bruselas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Col de Bruselas | Coles de Bruselas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 50 kcal | 35 kcal |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 2.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 4 g | 4.3 g |
| Protein | 4 g | 4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Coles de Bruselas has 30% fewer calories (35 kcal vs 50 kcal).
- Col de Bruselas has 24% less sugar (2.2 g vs 2.9 g).
- Col de Bruselas has 96% less salt (0 g vs 0.9 g).
Ingredients
Col de Bruselas
Coles de Bruselas. Categoría I.
Coles de Bruselas
Coles de Bruselas. Variedad: Cirus. Categoría I.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Col de Bruselas or Coles de Bruselas?
Overall, Col de Bruselas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Coles de Bruselas has fewer calories: 35 kcal versus 50 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Col de Bruselas has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 2.9 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Coles de Bruselas vs Rosenkohl lila
Col de Bruselas vs Coles de Bruselas
Coles de Bruselas vs Coles de Bruselas
Col de Bruselas vs Choux de Bruxelles
Choux de Bruxelles vs Coles de Bruselas
Col de Bruselas vs Coles de Bruselas
Brussels Bites Kit. Garl... vs Col de Bruselas
Coles de Bruselas vs Coles de Bruselas