Coconut vs Energy Drink +Vitamins Classic
Overall, Coconut has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coconut | Energy Drink +Vitamins Class... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 20 kcal | 23 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.9 g | 4.9 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Energy Drink +Vitamins Classic has no fat, while Coconut has 1 g.
- Energy Drink +Vitamins Classic has no saturated fat, while Coconut has 0.9 g.
- Coconut has 61% less sugar (1.9 g vs 4.9 g).
- Coconut has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Coconut
Water, kokosnootmelk (5,3%) (kokosroom, water), rijst (3,3%), tricalciumfosfaat, stabilisatoren (guarpitmeel, gellangom, xanthaangom), zeezout, aroma's, vitaminen (B12, D2).
Energy Drink +Vitamins Classic
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coconut or Energy Drink +Vitamins Classic?
Overall, Coconut has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Coconut has fewer calories: 20 kcal versus 23 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Coconut has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 4.9 g per 100 g.