Comparison

Classic Tomato Sauce vs Tomato ketchup -50 % de sucres et sel

Overall, Classic Tomato Sauce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientClassic Tomato SauceTomato ketchup -50 % de sucr...
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 100 kcal 64 kcal
Fat 1 g 0.1 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 2 g 11 g
Salt 0 g 0.9 g
Fiber 2.6 g 0 g
Protein 2 g 1.4 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedCelery

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tomato ketchup -50 % de sucres et sel has 36% fewer calories (64 kcal vs 100 kcal).
  • Tomato ketchup -50 % de sucres et sel has 90% less fat (0.1 g vs 1 g).
  • Classic Tomato Sauce has 82% less sugar (2 g vs 11 g).
  • Classic Tomato Sauce has no salt, while Tomato ketchup -50 % de sucres et sel has 0.9 g.
  • Classic Tomato Sauce has 100% more fiber (2.6 g vs 0 g).
  • Classic Tomato Sauce has 30% more protein (2 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Classic Tomato Sauce has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Tomato ketchup -50 % de sucres et sel lists: Celery.

Ingredients

Classic Tomato Sauce

Concentrato di pomodoro 61%, Zucchero, Aceto di vino, Acqua, Sale, Aroma naturale

Tomato ketchup -50 % de sucres et sel

Tomates (174g pour 100 g de Tomato Ketchup), vinaigre, sucre, sel, extraits d'epices Deckel et d'herbes (contiennent du céleri), édulcorant (glycosides de stéviol), épice,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Classic Tomato Sauce or Tomato ketchup -50 % de sucres et sel?

Overall, Classic Tomato Sauce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tomato ketchup -50 % de sucres et sel has fewer calories: 64 kcal versus 100 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Classic Tomato Sauce has less sugar: 2 g versus 11 g per 100 g.

More comparisons