Comparison

Civet de sanglier aux pates torsadees vs Civet de cerf

Overall, Civet de sanglier aux pates torsadees has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCivet de sanglier aux pates...Civet de cerf
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 112 kcal 113 kcal
Fat 2.4 g 3.5 g
Saturated fat 0.6 g 2.2 g
Sugars 0.5 g 2.5 g
Salt 0.9 g 1.2 g
Fiber — 1.9 g
Protein 12 g 16 g
Additives40
AllergensEggs, Gluten, Milk, Sesame seeds, Sulphur dioxide and sulphitesCelery, Gluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Civet de sanglier aux pates torsadees has 31% less fat (2.4 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Civet de sanglier aux pates torsadees has 73% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Civet de sanglier aux pates torsadees has 80% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Civet de sanglier aux pates torsadees has 27% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Civet de cerf has 25% more protein (16 g vs 12 g).
  • Civet de cerf has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Civet de sanglier aux pates torsadees lists: Eggs, Sesame seeds, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
  • Only Civet de cerf lists: Celery.

Ingredients

Civet de sanglier aux pates torsadees

Petit compartiment (180g) : Sanglier 26%, sauce, carottes, oignons grelots, champignons de Paris Sauce : Eau, vin rouge de Madiran (_sulfites_), concentré de tomates, fécule de pomme de terre, amidon modifié de maïs, sel, bouillon de bœuf (sel, exhausteur de goût : monoglutamate de sodium, lactose, graisse et extraits de viande de boeuf (8,27%)(antioxydant E310), arômes, extrait de levure, colorant : caramel E150c, plante aromatique, épices (_gluten_, _lait_, _sésame_)), huile d'olive, épices(_sulfites_). Grand compartiment (120g) : Pâtes torsadées précuites 38% (semoule de _blé_ dur, poudre de blanc d'_oeuf_), huile de colza, sel

Civet de cerf

Viande de cerf 45% (origine: UE), eau, vin rouge de Cahors 8%, champignon de Paris miniature cuisiné (champignon de Paris miniature 7,1%, eau, vin blanc, jus de citron, sel), bouillon de légumes (eau, CÉLERI, tomate, carotte, champignon de Paris, poireau, baie de genièvre), groseille 3,7%, échalote, porto rouge dénaturé (porto rouge, sel), beurre (LAIT), oignon, myrtille, sel, miel, fond de boeuf [viande, graisse et jus de cuisson de boeuf (origine : France*), sel], madère dénaturé (madère, sel, arôme naturel), amidon de riz, farine de BLÉ (GLUTEN), double concentré de tomate, carotte, beurre concentré (LAIT), ail, poivre. * Issue d'animaux nés, élevés et abattus en France. Peut contenir des traces de: crustacés, œuf, poissons, soja, fruits à coque, moutarde, sésame, mollusques.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Civet de sanglier aux pates torsadees or Civet de cerf?

Overall, Civet de sanglier aux pates torsadees has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Civet de sanglier aux pates torsadees has fewer calories: 112 kcal versus 113 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Civet de sanglier aux pates torsadees has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons