Cinnamon Rolls vs Cacau magro em pó
Overall, Cacau magro em pó has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cinnamon Rolls | Cacau magro em pó |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 331 kcal | 317 kcal |
| Fat | 10 g | 11 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.7 g | 7 g |
| Sugars | 16 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 2.8 g | 26.4 g |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cinnamon Rolls has 33% less saturated fat (4.7 g vs 7 g).
- Cacau magro em pó has 91% less sugar (1.5 g vs 16 g).
- Cacau magro em pó has 80% less salt (0.2 g vs 1 g).
- Cacau magro em pó has 89% more fiber (26.4 g vs 2.8 g).
- Cacau magro em pó has 73% more protein (25 g vs 6.7 g).
- Cacau magro em pó has the better Nutri-Score.
- Cacau magro em pó is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Cinnamon Rolls lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Cinnamon Rolls
Préparation pour pâte (200 g) : de la farine de BLÉ 78%, du sucre, de l'huile de mais, de la levure de boulangerie déshydratée, de la poudre à lever (E575 et carbonates de sodium), du LAIT écrémé, une pincée de sel, du levain de BLE, de l'Œuf entier et un émulsifiant (E491). Préparation pour fourrage (42g) : du sucre et de la bonne cannelle (17%).
Cacau magro em pó
fat-reduced cocoa powder, cocoa butter (10% minimum)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cinnamon Rolls or Cacau magro em pó?
Overall, Cacau magro em pó has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cacau magro em pó has fewer calories: 317 kcal versus 331 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cacau magro em pó has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 16 g per 100 g.