Mix pain moelleux vs Cacau magro em pó
Overall, Cacau magro em pó has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Mix pain moelleux
Cacau magro em pó
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mix pain moelleux | Cacau magro em pó |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 332 kcal | 317 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 11 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 7 g |
| Sugars | 5.3 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 2.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 4.9 g | 26.4 g |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mix pain moelleux has 95% less fat (0.5 g vs 11 g).
- Mix pain moelleux has 99% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 7 g).
- Cacau magro em pó has 72% less sugar (1.5 g vs 5.3 g).
- Cacau magro em pó has 92% less salt (0.2 g vs 2.5 g).
- Cacau magro em pó has 81% more fiber (26.4 g vs 4.9 g).
- Cacau magro em pó has 73% more protein (25 g vs 6.7 g).
- Cacau magro em pó has the better Nutri-Score.
- Cacau magro em pó is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Mix pain moelleux lists: Eggs.
Ingredients
Mix pain moelleux
Farine de riz semi-complète*, fécule de manioc*, fécule de pomme de terre*, farine de sarrasin*, poudre de blanc d'_œuf_*, sucre de canne blond*, fibre de psyllium*, sel, épaississant : gomme de guar* *ingrédients issus de l'agriculture biologique,
Cacau magro em pó
fat-reduced cocoa powder, cocoa butter (10% minimum)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mix pain moelleux or Cacau magro em pó?
Overall, Cacau magro em pó has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cacau magro em pó has fewer calories: 317 kcal versus 332 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cacau magro em pó has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 5.3 g per 100 g.