Cinnamon roll vs Ombar
Overall, Ombar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cinnamon roll | Ombar |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 542 kcal | 599 kcal |
| Fat | 32 g | 46 g |
| Saturated fat | 17 g | 32 g |
| Sugars | 41 g | 34 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 3.8 g | 6.3 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Nuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cinnamon roll has 30% less fat (32 g vs 46 g).
- Cinnamon roll has 47% less saturated fat (17 g vs 32 g).
- Ombar has 17% less sugar (34 g vs 41 g).
- Ombar has 40% more protein (6.3 g vs 3.8 g).
- Ombar is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Cinnamon roll lists: Gluten, Nuts.
Ingredients
Cinnamon roll
Rubenzucker*, Kakaobutter* 17%, Haselnussmark*, Kakaomasse* 14%, Buchweizenmehl*, Erdmandelmehl*, Waffelstückchen 3,0% (Weizenmehl*, Emulgator: Lecithine; Sonnenblumenöl*, Meersalz), Zimt (Ceylon) 2,5%, Mandelöl*, Meersalz*, Bourbon Vanilleextrakt*. *aus biologischem Anbau. Kann andere Schalenfrüchte und Milch enthalten.
Ombar
Unroasted Cacao**, Coconut Sugar*, Creamed Coconut*, Cocoa Butter**, Vanilla Extract*.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cinnamon roll or Ombar?
Overall, Ombar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cinnamon roll has fewer calories: 542 kcal versus 599 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ombar has less sugar: 34 g versus 41 g per 100 g.