Comparison

Ciabatta classic vs Ciabattine

Overall, Ciabattine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCiabatta classicCiabattine
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 256 kcal 230 kcal
Fat 3.5 g 3.3 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 0.6 g
Sugars 8.7 g 3.9 g
Salt 0.9 g 1.2 g
Fiber 5.6 g 6.8 g
Protein 4.1 g 4.6 g
Additives32
AllergensSoybeans, SojaproteinNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Ciabattine has 10% fewer calories (230 kcal vs 256 kcal).
  • Ciabatta classic has 53% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Ciabattine has 55% less sugar (3.9 g vs 8.7 g).
  • Ciabattine has 18% more fiber (6.8 g vs 5.6 g).
  • Ciabattine has 11% more protein (4.6 g vs 4.1 g).
  • Only Ciabatta classic lists: Soybeans, Sojaprotein.

Ingredients

Ciabatta classic

Wasser, Maisstärke, Sauerteig: Reismehl, Wasser; Reismehl, Invertzuckersirup, Flohsamenschalen, Reisstärke, Sonnenblumenöl, Sojaprotein, Zucker, Verdickungsmittel: Hydroxypropylmethylcellulose; Hefe, Salz, Säureregulator: Natriumacetat. Kann Spuren von Mandeln und Sesam enthalten.

Ciabattine

Maisstärke, Wasser, Sauerteig 12% (Reismehl, Wasser), Maismehl, Reismehl, Flohsamenschalen (Plantago Psyllium), Verdickungsmittel: Hydroxypropylmethylcellulose Sojaprotein, Sonnenblumenöl, Hefe 2,1%, natives Olivenöl extra 0,9%, Salz, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure, Weinsäure (L+). Kann Lupinen und Senf enthalten. LAKTOSEFREI. WEIZENFREI.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Ciabatta classic or Ciabattine?

Overall, Ciabattine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Ciabattine has fewer calories: 230 kcal versus 256 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Ciabattine has less sugar: 3.9 g versus 8.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons