Churros pomme de terre vs Churros
Overall, Churros has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Churros pomme de terre | Churros |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 285 kcal | 170 kcal |
| Fat | 15 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 4.4 g | 6.5 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | — |
| Protein | 6.2 g | 5.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Churros has 40% fewer calories (170 kcal vs 285 kcal).
- Churros has 95% less fat (0.8 g vs 15 g).
- Churros has 95% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 4.3 g).
- Churros pomme de terre has 32% less sugar (4.4 g vs 6.5 g).
- Churros pomme de terre has 35% less salt (1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Churros has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Churros pomme de terre lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Churros pomme de terre
Churros de pommes de terre (350g): pommes de terre 31,5%, farine de blé, huile de tournesol, lait demi-écrémé, eau, œufs entiers, emmental, beurre, sel, poudres à lever (disphosphates, dont a carbonates de sodium), poivre, muscade, amidon de blé. Crème légère à la ciboulette (70g): crème légère 66 %, fromage nature, échalote, ciboulette 5,9%, vinaigre de vin blanc, sel, fibre de protéines, poivre. Traces éventuelles de poissons et crustacés. Conditionné sous atmosphère protectrice.
Churros
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Churros pomme de terre or Churros?
Overall, Churros has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Churros has fewer calories: 170 kcal versus 285 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Churros pomme de terre has less sugar: 4.4 g versus 6.5 g per 100 g.