Chucrut al estilo bávaro vs Golden turmeric
Overall, Golden turmeric has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Chucrut al estilo bávaro
Golden turmeric
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chucrut al estilo bávaro | Golden turmeric |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 22 kcal | 15 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Golden turmeric has 32% fewer calories (15 kcal vs 22 kcal).
- Golden turmeric has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Golden turmeric has 29% less sugar (1.2 g vs 1.7 g).
- Chucrut al estilo bávaro has 35% less salt (1.1 g vs 1.7 g).
- Chucrut al estilo bávaro has 53% more protein (1.5 g vs 0.7 g).
Ingredients
Chucrut al estilo bávaro
Col blanca, vino blanco, sal, ácido ascórbico
Golden turmeric
White cabbage (41%), water, sauerkraut juice (23%), ginger juice*(5%), spirit vinegar, sea salt, turmeric (<1%)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chucrut al estilo bávaro or Golden turmeric?
Overall, Golden turmeric has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Golden turmeric has fewer calories: 15 kcal versus 22 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Golden turmeric has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.