Comparison
Choucroute vs Ekologiczna kapusta kiszona
Overall, Ekologiczna kapusta kiszona has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Choucroute | Ekologiczna kapusta kiszona |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 38 kcal | 20 kcal |
| Fat | 2.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 2 g |
| Protein | 1.3 g | 1.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ekologiczna kapusta kiszona has 47% fewer calories (20 kcal vs 38 kcal).
- Ekologiczna kapusta kiszona has 95% less fat (0.1 g vs 2.1 g).
- Ekologiczna kapusta kiszona has 88% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.8 g).
- Ekologiczna kapusta kiszona has 92% less sugar (0.1 g vs 1.3 g).
- Choucroute has 28% less salt (1.3 g vs 1.8 g).
Ingredients
Choucroute
Not available.
Ekologiczna kapusta kiszona
Ekologiczna kapusta, sól.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Choucroute or Ekologiczna kapusta kiszona?
Overall, Ekologiczna kapusta kiszona has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ekologiczna kapusta kiszona has fewer calories: 20 kcal versus 38 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ekologiczna kapusta kiszona has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.