Chorizo riojano vs Cecina de Leon
Overall, Cecina de Leon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chorizo riojano | Cecina de Leon |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 499 kcal | 240 kcal |
| Fat | 42 g | 7.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 14 g | 2.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 4.3 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 28 g | 42 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cecina de Leon has 52% fewer calories (240 kcal vs 499 kcal).
- Cecina de Leon has 82% less fat (7.7 g vs 42 g).
- Cecina de Leon has 79% less saturated fat (2.9 g vs 14 g).
- Cecina de Leon has no sugar, while Chorizo riojano has 0.5 g.
- Cecina de Leon has 61% less salt (1.7 g vs 4.3 g).
- Cecina de Leon has 33% more protein (42 g vs 28 g).
Ingredients
Chorizo riojano
Viande et graisse de porc 95%, Paprika 3% (de la Vera), Sel (de Añana), Ail (de Las Pedroñeras), Embossé en boyaux naturel de porc
Cecina de Leon
Carne de vaca, sal.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chorizo riojano or Cecina de Leon?
Overall, Cecina de Leon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cecina de Leon has fewer calories: 240 kcal versus 499 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cecina de Leon has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.