Comparison
Chopped tomatoes vs Passata Rustica
Overall, Chopped tomatoes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chopped tomatoes | Passata Rustica |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 28 kcal | 37 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 4.5 g | 4.2 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 1.4 g | 1.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chopped tomatoes has 24% fewer calories (28 kcal vs 37 kcal).
Ingredients
Chopped tomatoes
Chopped peeled tomatoes. Tomato juice
Passata Rustica
Tomaten, zuurteregelaar (E330).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chopped tomatoes or Passata Rustica?
Overall, Chopped tomatoes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chopped tomatoes has fewer calories: 28 kcal versus 37 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Passata Rustica has less sugar: 4.2 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Passierte Tomaten vs Passata Rustica
Tomato, Feta & Carameliz... vs Passata Rustica
Deluxe Polpa Di Pomodoro vs Passata Rustica
Passata Rustica vs Polpa Pomodoro
Passata Rustica vs Ekologiska Passerade tom...
Passierte Tomaten vs Chopped tomatoes
Passata Rustica vs Hakkede tomater Spicy ch...
Chopped tomatoes vs Tomato, Feta & Carameliz...