Passata Rustica vs Hakkede tomater Spicy chili
Overall, Passata Rustica has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Passata Rustica | Hakkede tomater Spicy chili |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 37 kcal | 27 kcal |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 4.2 g | 4.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 1.5 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 1.4 g | 1.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hakkede tomater Spicy chili has 27% fewer calories (27 kcal vs 37 kcal).
- Hakkede tomater Spicy chili has 75% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
- Passata Rustica has 33% more fiber (1.5 g vs 1 g).
- Passata Rustica has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Passata Rustica
Tomaten, zuurteregelaar (E330).
Hakkede tomater Spicy chili
Hakkede tomater (65%), tomatjuice (34%), salt, chilipulver (0,2%), surhetsregulerende middel (E330)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Passata Rustica or Hakkede tomater Spicy chili?
Overall, Passata Rustica has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hakkede tomater Spicy chili has fewer calories: 27 kcal versus 37 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Passata Rustica has less sugar: 4.2 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.