Comparison

Choped tipo lata cuadrado vs Arroz negro

Overall, Arroz negro has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChoped tipo lata cuadradoArroz negro
Nutri-Score d b
NOVA group — —
Calories 172 kcal 138 kcal
Fat 11.5 g 3.8 g
Saturated fat 4 g 1 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.5 g
Salt 2.2 g 0.7 g
Protein 13 g 8.9 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Arroz negro has 20% fewer calories (138 kcal vs 172 kcal).
  • Arroz negro has 67% less fat (3.8 g vs 11.5 g).
  • Arroz negro has 75% less saturated fat (1 g vs 4 g).
  • Arroz negro has 67% less salt (0.7 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Choped tipo lata cuadrado has 32% more protein (13 g vs 8.9 g).
  • Arroz negro has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Choped tipo lata cuadrado

Not available.

Arroz negro

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Choped tipo lata cuadrado or Arroz negro?

Overall, Arroz negro has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Arroz negro has fewer calories: 138 kcal versus 172 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Choped tipo lata cuadrado has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons