Comparison

Trufas clásicas al cacao vs Choped tipo lata cuadrado

Overall, Choped tipo lata cuadrado has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTrufas clásicas al cacaoChoped tipo lata cuadrado
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 620 kcal 172 kcal
Fat 46 g 11.5 g
Saturated fat 36 g 4 g
Sugars 41 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.2 g 2.2 g
Fiber 1 g —
Protein 4 g 13 g
Additives00
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Choped tipo lata cuadrado has 72% fewer calories (172 kcal vs 620 kcal).
  • Choped tipo lata cuadrado has 75% less fat (11.5 g vs 46 g).
  • Choped tipo lata cuadrado has 89% less saturated fat (4 g vs 36 g).
  • Choped tipo lata cuadrado has 99% less sugar (0.5 g vs 41 g).
  • Trufas clásicas al cacao has 91% less salt (0.2 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Choped tipo lata cuadrado has 69% more protein (13 g vs 4 g).
  • Choped tipo lata cuadrado has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Trufas clásicas al cacao lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Trufas clásicas al cacao

Grasas vegetales (palma, palmiste, coco), azúcar, cacao desgrasado en polvo (14,8%), lactosuero en polvo, aroma de vainilla. Puede contener otros frutos de cáscara, cacahuete y soja.

Choped tipo lata cuadrado

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Trufas clásicas al cacao or Choped tipo lata cuadrado?

Overall, Choped tipo lata cuadrado has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Choped tipo lata cuadrado has fewer calories: 172 kcal versus 620 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Choped tipo lata cuadrado has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 41 g per 100 g.

More comparisons