Comparison

Trufas clásicas al cacao vs Zumo+Leche Caribe

Overall, Zumo+Leche Caribe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTrufas clásicas al cacaoZumo+Leche Caribe
Nutri-Score e b
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 620 kcal 31 kcal
Fat 46 g 0 g
Saturated fat 36 g 0 g
Sugars 41 g 6.8 g
Salt 0.2 g 0 g
Fiber 1 g —
Protein 4 g 0.4 g
Additives00
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Zumo+Leche Caribe has 95% fewer calories (31 kcal vs 620 kcal).
  • Zumo+Leche Caribe has no fat, while Trufas clásicas al cacao has 46 g.
  • Zumo+Leche Caribe has no saturated fat, while Trufas clásicas al cacao has 36 g.
  • Zumo+Leche Caribe has 83% less sugar (6.8 g vs 41 g).
  • Trufas clásicas al cacao has 90% more protein (4 g vs 0.4 g).
  • Zumo+Leche Caribe has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Trufas clásicas al cacao lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Trufas clásicas al cacao

Grasas vegetales (palma, palmiste, coco), azúcar, cacao desgrasado en polvo (14,8%), lactosuero en polvo, aroma de vainilla. Puede contener otros frutos de cáscara, cacahuete y soja.

Zumo+Leche Caribe

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Trufas clásicas al cacao or Zumo+Leche Caribe?

Overall, Zumo+Leche Caribe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Zumo+Leche Caribe has fewer calories: 31 kcal versus 620 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Zumo+Leche Caribe has less sugar: 6.8 g versus 41 g per 100 g.

More comparisons