Chili strawberries vs Avena extra fina
Overall, Avena extra fina has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chili strawberries | Avena extra fina |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 328 kcal | 352 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1.5 g |
| Sugars | 55 g | 55.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 9.8 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 11.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chili strawberries has no fat, while Avena extra fina has 7 g.
- Chili strawberries has no saturated fat, while Avena extra fina has 1.5 g.
- Avena extra fina has 74% more fiber (9.8 g vs 2.5 g).
- Avena extra fina has 100% more protein (11.8 g vs 0 g).
- Avena extra fina has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Chili strawberries
dried srrawberries, canela sugar, sumflower oil, Chili sauce
Avena extra fina
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chili strawberries or Avena extra fina?
Overall, Avena extra fina has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chili strawberries has fewer calories: 328 kcal versus 352 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chili strawberries has less sugar: 55 g versus 55.8 g per 100 g.