Avena extra fina vs Wurstel pollo
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Avena extra fina | Wurstel pollo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 352 kcal | 141 kcal |
| Fat | 7 g | 8.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.5 g | 2.2 g |
| Sugars | 55.8 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 3 g |
| Fiber | 9.8 g | — |
| Protein | 11.8 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wurstel pollo has 60% fewer calories (141 kcal vs 352 kcal).
- Avena extra fina has 14% less fat (7 g vs 8.1 g).
- Avena extra fina has 32% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 2.2 g).
- Wurstel pollo has 99% less sugar (0.7 g vs 55.8 g).
- Avena extra fina has no salt, while Wurstel pollo has 3 g.
- Wurstel pollo has 16% more protein (14 g vs 11.8 g).
Ingredients
Avena extra fina
Not available.
Wurstel pollo
Carne di tacchino 42%, carne di pollo 28%, acqua, sale iodato (saie, iuuatu ui potassic 0,007%), fibre vegetali, amido di patata, estratti di spezie sale, aromi di affumicatura, aromi, aromi naturali, antiossidante: ascorbato di Sou:u, Conservante: nitrito di sodio. SENZA GLUTINE.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Avena extra fina or Wurstel pollo?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wurstel pollo has fewer calories: 141 kcal versus 352 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wurstel pollo has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 55.8 g per 100 g.