Comparison

Chili strawberries vs Wurstel pollo

Overall, Wurstel pollo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChili strawberriesWurstel pollo
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group — 4
Calories 328 kcal 141 kcal
Fat 0 g 8.1 g
Saturated fat 0 g 2.2 g
Sugars 55 g 0.7 g
Salt 0 g 3 g
Fiber 2.5 g —
Protein 0 g 14 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Wurstel pollo has 57% fewer calories (141 kcal vs 328 kcal).
  • Chili strawberries has no fat, while Wurstel pollo has 8.1 g.
  • Chili strawberries has no saturated fat, while Wurstel pollo has 2.2 g.
  • Wurstel pollo has 99% less sugar (0.7 g vs 55 g).
  • Chili strawberries has 100% less salt (0 g vs 3 g).
  • Wurstel pollo has 100% more protein (14 g vs 0 g).
  • Wurstel pollo has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Chili strawberries

dried srrawberries, canela sugar, sumflower oil, Chili sauce

Wurstel pollo

Carne di tacchino 42%, carne di pollo 28%, acqua, sale iodato (saie, iuuatu ui potassic 0,007%), fibre vegetali, amido di patata, estratti di spezie sale, aromi di affumicatura, aromi, aromi naturali, antiossidante: ascorbato di Sou:u, Conservante: nitrito di sodio. SENZA GLUTINE.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chili strawberries or Wurstel pollo?

Overall, Wurstel pollo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Wurstel pollo has fewer calories: 141 kcal versus 328 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Wurstel pollo has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 55 g per 100 g.

More comparisons