Comparison

Chicken Liver Parfait vs Pate de pasăre

Overall, Pate de pasăre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChicken Liver ParfaitPate de pasăre
Nutri-Score e c
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 341 kcal 150 kcal
Fat 31.8 g 10 g
Saturated fat 17 g 1.6 g
Sugars 2.3 g 1.3 g
Salt 1.2 g 1.5 g
Fiber 1 g —
Protein 7.1 g 9.1 g
Additives21
AllergensMilkSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pate de pasăre has 56% fewer calories (150 kcal vs 341 kcal).
  • Pate de pasăre has 69% less fat (10 g vs 31.8 g).
  • Pate de pasăre has 91% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 17 g).
  • Pate de pasăre has 43% less sugar (1.3 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Pate de pasăre has 22% more protein (9.1 g vs 7.1 g).
  • Pate de pasăre has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Chicken Liver Parfait lists: Milk.
  • Only Pate de pasăre lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Chicken Liver Parfait

Chicken Liver (40%). Butter (Milk), Double Cream (Milk), Water, Pork Fat, Clarified Butter (Milk) (6%), Tapioca Starch, Cognac (3.5%), Rapeseed Oil, Sugar, Salt, Garlic Purée, Antioxidant (Ascorbic Acid), White Pepper, Mace, Preservative (Sodium Nitrite). Made using British chicken.

Pate de pasăre

20% ficat de pui, apă, carne de pasăre, ulei de floarea-soarelui, proteină vegetală din soia, amidon din porumb, sare, zahăr, ceapă pudră, boia de ardei, ulei de cimbru, conservant: nitrit de sodiu; ulei de piper.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chicken Liver Parfait or Pate de pasăre?

Overall, Pate de pasăre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pate de pasăre has fewer calories: 150 kcal versus 341 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pate de pasăre has less sugar: 1.3 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons