R / Confit F.vol 180G vs Pate de pasăre
Overall, Pate de pasăre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | R / Confit F.vol 180G | Pate de pasăre |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 352 kcal | 150 kcal |
| Fat | 33.2 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 13.2 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 0.3 g | — |
| Protein | 11.3 g | 9.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pate de pasăre has 57% fewer calories (150 kcal vs 352 kcal).
- Pate de pasăre has 70% less fat (10 g vs 33.2 g).
- Pate de pasăre has 88% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 13.2 g).
- R / Confit F.vol 180G has 62% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.3 g).
- R / Confit F.vol 180G has 19% more protein (11.3 g vs 9.1 g).
- Pate de pasăre has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pate de pasăre lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
R / Confit F.vol 180G
Foie de poulet (Origine : France) 46 %, gras de porc 28 %, gorge de porc (Origine : France) 20 %, porto rouge 3 %, sel, poivre. Traces de moutarde, lait et oeufs.
Pate de pasăre
20% ficat de pui, apă, carne de pasăre, ulei de floarea-soarelui, proteină vegetală din soia, amidon din porumb, sare, zahăr, ceapă pudră, boia de ardei, ulei de cimbru, conservant: nitrit de sodiu; ulei de piper.
FAQ
Which is healthier: R / Confit F.vol 180G or Pate de pasăre?
Overall, Pate de pasăre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pate de pasăre has fewer calories: 150 kcal versus 352 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
R / Confit F.vol 180G has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.