Chicken Karaage vs Karaage chicken
Overall, Karaage chicken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chicken Karaage | Karaage chicken |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 252 kcal | 204 kcal |
| Fat | 14.8 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.2 g | 1.7 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 11.1 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Karaage chicken has 19% fewer calories (204 kcal vs 252 kcal).
- Karaage chicken has 19% less fat (12 g vs 14.8 g).
- Karaage chicken has 23% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 2.2 g).
- Karaage chicken has 46% less sugar (1.2 g vs 2.2 g).
- Karaage chicken has 63% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.4 g).
- Karaage chicken has 15% more protein (13 g vs 11.1 g).
- Karaage chicken has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Chicken Karaage
Not available.
Karaage chicken
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chicken Karaage or Karaage chicken?
Overall, Karaage chicken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Karaage chicken has fewer calories: 204 kcal versus 252 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Karaage chicken has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.