Comparison

Chicken Karaage vs Chicken KARAAGE Fried Seasoned Boneless Chicken Thigh Meat

Overall, Chicken KARAAGE Fried Seasoned Boneless Chicken Thigh Meat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChicken KaraageChicken KARAAGE Fried Season...
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group — —
Calories 252 kcal 179 kcal
Fat 14.8 g 9.5 g
Saturated fat 2.2 g 2.4 g
Sugars 2.2 g 1.2 g
Salt 1.4 g 1.3 g
Fiber 0 g 1.2 g
Protein 11.1 g 16.7 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chicken KARAAGE Fried Seasoned Boneless Chicken Thigh Meat has 29% fewer calories (179 kcal vs 252 kcal).
  • Chicken KARAAGE Fried Seasoned Boneless Chicken Thigh Meat has 36% less fat (9.5 g vs 14.8 g).
  • Chicken KARAAGE Fried Seasoned Boneless Chicken Thigh Meat has 46% less sugar (1.2 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Chicken KARAAGE Fried Seasoned Boneless Chicken Thigh Meat has 100% more fiber (1.2 g vs 0 g).
  • Chicken KARAAGE Fried Seasoned Boneless Chicken Thigh Meat has 33% more protein (16.7 g vs 11.1 g).
  • Chicken KARAAGE Fried Seasoned Boneless Chicken Thigh Meat has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Chicken Karaage

Not available.

Chicken KARAAGE Fried Seasoned Boneless Chicken Thigh Meat

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chicken Karaage or Chicken KARAAGE Fried Seasoned Boneless Chicken Thigh Meat?

Overall, Chicken KARAAGE Fried Seasoned Boneless Chicken Thigh Meat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chicken KARAAGE Fried Seasoned Boneless Chicken Thigh Meat has fewer calories: 179 kcal versus 252 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chicken KARAAGE Fried Seasoned Boneless Chicken Thigh Meat has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons