Charal roti cuit - de boeuf - vs Slow cooked pork with a miso maple glaze
Overall, Charal roti cuit - de boeuf - has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Charal roti cuit - de boeuf -
Slow cooked pork with a miso maple glaze
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Charal roti cuit - de boeuf... | Slow cooked pork with a miso... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 145 kcal | 288 kcal |
| Fat | 5.9 g | 14.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.6 g | 3.9 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 2.8 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 33 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Charal roti cuit - de boeuf - has 50% fewer calories (145 kcal vs 288 kcal).
- Charal roti cuit - de boeuf - has 60% less fat (5.9 g vs 14.9 g).
- Charal roti cuit - de boeuf - has 33% less saturated fat (2.6 g vs 3.9 g).
- Charal roti cuit - de boeuf - has 46% less sugar (1.5 g vs 2.8 g).
- Slow cooked pork with a miso maple glaze has 36% more protein (33 g vs 21 g).
- Charal roti cuit - de boeuf - has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Slow cooked pork with a miso maple glaze lists: Gluten, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Charal roti cuit - de boeuf -
Viande bovine (faux-filet) 88,2%, eau, sel, arômes naturels, amidon de maïs et fécule de pomme de terre, fibres de bambou, d'agrume et de pomme de terre, protéine de pois, antioxydants : acide ascorbique et ascorbate de sodium, dextrose de maïs, ferments, sucre caramélisé.
Slow cooked pork with a miso maple glaze
Pork shoulder (80%), water, glucose syrup, fermented red chilli, sugar, fermented broad beans, rice wine vinegar, fermented soya bean, maple syrup, salt, soya bean, diced onion, sunflower oil, cornflour, red miso (soya beans, sugar, water, salt, wheat), garlic, brown sugar, ginger purée, mirin.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Charal roti cuit - de boeuf - or Slow cooked pork with a miso maple glaze?
Overall, Charal roti cuit - de boeuf - has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Charal roti cuit - de boeuf - has fewer calories: 145 kcal versus 288 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Charal roti cuit - de boeuf - has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 2.8 g per 100 g.