Chair de tomates vs Polpa di pomodoro
Overall, Chair de tomates has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chair de tomates | Polpa di pomodoro |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 33 kcal | 26 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 4.8 g | 2.8 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 1.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Polpa di pomodoro has 21% fewer calories (26 kcal vs 33 kcal).
- Polpa di pomodoro has 42% less sugar (2.8 g vs 4.8 g).
- Chair de tomates has 100% more fiber (2.5 g vs 0 g).
- Chair de tomates has 20% more protein (1.5 g vs 1.2 g).
- Chair de tomates has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Chair de tomates
Pulpe de tomates bio 99 %, sel marin. Peut contenir des traces de lactose, céleri et moutarde.
Polpa di pomodoro
Knuste tomater 99,8%, salt.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chair de tomates or Polpa di pomodoro?
Overall, Chair de tomates has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Polpa di pomodoro has fewer calories: 26 kcal versus 33 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Polpa di pomodoro has less sugar: 2.8 g versus 4.8 g per 100 g.