Chair de tomates vs Polpa Tomates concassées fines
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chair de tomates | Polpa Tomates concassées fin... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 33 kcal | 26 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 4.8 g | 2.8 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 1.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Polpa Tomates concassées fines has 21% fewer calories (26 kcal vs 33 kcal).
- Polpa Tomates concassées fines has 42% less sugar (2.8 g vs 4.8 g).
- Chair de tomates has 52% more fiber (2.5 g vs 1.2 g).
- Chair de tomates has 20% more protein (1.5 g vs 1.2 g).
Ingredients
Chair de tomates
Pulpe de tomates bio 99 %, sel marin. Peut contenir des traces de lactose, céleri et moutarde.
Polpa Tomates concassées fines
Tomate 99,8%, sel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chair de tomates or Polpa Tomates concassées fines?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Polpa Tomates concassées fines has fewer calories: 26 kcal versus 33 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Polpa Tomates concassées fines has less sugar: 2.8 g versus 4.8 g per 100 g.