Comparison

Cereais e Fibra vs Belgian Choc Salted Caramel

Overall, Cereais e Fibra has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCereais e FibraBelgian Choc Salted Caramel
Nutri-Score — e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 335 kcal 40 kcal
Fat 0.2 g 0.8 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.5 g
Sugars 5 g 5.7 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.3 g
Fiber 21 g —
Protein 4.8 g 1 g
Additives110
AllergensGlutenMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Belgian Choc Salted Caramel has 88% fewer calories (40 kcal vs 335 kcal).
  • Cereais e Fibra has 75% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Cereais e Fibra has 80% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Cereais e Fibra has 12% less sugar (5 g vs 5.7 g).
  • Cereais e Fibra has 79% more protein (4.8 g vs 1 g).
  • Only Cereais e Fibra lists: Gluten.
  • Only Belgian Choc Salted Caramel lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Cereais e Fibra

Cevada (31%), _Cevada_ malteada (23%), inulina, chicória (15,5%), _centeio_ (8%), regulador de acidez (E 525).

Belgian Choc Salted Caramel

milk permeate powder, fat-reduced cocoa powder (20%), thickeners (acacia gum, xanthan gum), dried glucose syrup, belgian chocolate (6%) (sugar, cocoa mass, fat-reduced cocoa powder, flavouring), skimmed milk powder, coconut oil, salt, flavourings, emulsifiers (sunflower lecithin, e472e), sweeteners (acesulfame k, sucralose), anti-caking agent (e551), stabiliser (e340ii),

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cereais e Fibra or Belgian Choc Salted Caramel?

Overall, Cereais e Fibra has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Belgian Choc Salted Caramel has fewer calories: 40 kcal versus 335 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cereais e Fibra has less sugar: 5 g versus 5.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons