Cassoulet de Castelnaudary vs Cassoulet au porc
Overall, Cassoulet au porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cassoulet de Castelnaudary | Cassoulet au porc |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 137 kcal | 127 kcal |
| Fat | 6.2 g | 5.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.3 g | 1.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.1 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 9.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cassoulet au porc has 11% less fat (5.5 g vs 6.2 g).
- Cassoulet au porc has 17% less saturated fat (1.9 g vs 2.3 g).
- Cassoulet de Castelnaudary has 19% more protein (12 g vs 9.7 g).
- Cassoulet au porc has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Cassoulet de Castelnaudary
Cassoulet supérieur au manchon de canard et à la saucisse de Toulouse. Ingrédients eau, 28% haricots lingots, 23% manchon de canard précuit (manchon de canard (origine France), sel), 16% saucisse de Toulouse grillée (viande et gras de porc (origine France), eau, boyau naturel de porc, sel, poivre), concentré de tomate, sel, graisse de canard, ail, poivre.
Cassoulet au porc
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cassoulet de Castelnaudary or Cassoulet au porc?
Overall, Cassoulet au porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cassoulet au porc has fewer calories: 127 kcal versus 137 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cassoulet au porc has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.