Comparison

Cassoulet de Castelnaudary vs Cassoulet de castelnaudary

Overall, Cassoulet de Castelnaudary has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCassoulet de CastelnaudaryCassoulet de castelnaudary
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 137 kcal 153 kcal
Fat 6.2 g 9.2 g
Saturated fat 2.3 g 3.8 g
Sugars 0.8 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.9 g 0.6 g
Protein 12 g 9.5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cassoulet de Castelnaudary has 10% fewer calories (137 kcal vs 153 kcal).
  • Cassoulet de Castelnaudary has 33% less fat (6.2 g vs 9.2 g).
  • Cassoulet de Castelnaudary has 39% less saturated fat (2.3 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Cassoulet de castelnaudary has 38% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Cassoulet de Castelnaudary has 21% more protein (12 g vs 9.5 g).

Ingredients

Cassoulet de Castelnaudary

Cassoulet supérieur au manchon de canard et à la saucisse de Toulouse. Ingrédients eau, 28% haricots lingots, 23% manchon de canard précuit (manchon de canard (origine France), sel), 16% saucisse de Toulouse grillée (viande et gras de porc (origine France), eau, boyau naturel de porc, sel, poivre), concentré de tomate, sel, graisse de canard, ail, poivre.

Cassoulet de castelnaudary

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cassoulet de Castelnaudary or Cassoulet de castelnaudary?

Overall, Cassoulet de Castelnaudary has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cassoulet de Castelnaudary has fewer calories: 137 kcal versus 153 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cassoulet de castelnaudary has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons