Cassoulet de Castelnaudary vs Cassoulet de castelnaudary
Overall, Cassoulet de Castelnaudary has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cassoulet de Castelnaudary | Cassoulet de castelnaudary |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 148 kcal | 153 kcal |
| Fat | 7.7 g | 9.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.8 g | 3.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 9.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cassoulet de Castelnaudary has 17% less fat (7.7 g vs 9.2 g).
- Cassoulet de Castelnaudary has 26% less saturated fat (2.8 g vs 3.8 g).
- Cassoulet de castelnaudary has 38% less salt (0.6 g vs 0.9 g).
- Cassoulet de Castelnaudary has 14% more protein (11 g vs 9.5 g).
Ingredients
Cassoulet de Castelnaudary
Not available.
Cassoulet de castelnaudary
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cassoulet de Castelnaudary or Cassoulet de castelnaudary?
Overall, Cassoulet de Castelnaudary has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cassoulet de Castelnaudary has fewer calories: 148 kcal versus 153 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cassoulet de Castelnaudary has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.