Comparison

Cassoulet au porc vs Cassoulet de castelnaudary

Overall, Cassoulet au porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Better choice

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Cassoulet au porc	Cassoulet de castelnaudary
Nutri-Score	a	c
NOVA group	—	—
Calories	127 kcal	153 kcal
Fat	5.5 g	9.2 g
Saturated fat	1.9 g	3.8 g
Sugars	0.7 g	0.5 g
Salt	0.8 g	0.6 g
Fiber	3.1 g	—
Protein	9.7 g	9.5 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Cassoulet au porc has 17% fewer calories (127 kcal vs 153 kcal).
Cassoulet au porc has 40% less fat (5.5 g vs 9.2 g).
Cassoulet au porc has 50% less saturated fat (1.9 g vs 3.8 g).
Cassoulet au porc has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Cassoulet au porc

Not available.

Cassoulet de castelnaudary

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cassoulet au porc or Cassoulet de castelnaudary?

Overall, Cassoulet au porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cassoulet au porc has fewer calories: 127 kcal versus 153 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cassoulet de castelnaudary has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Cassoulet de Castelnauda... vs Cassoulet au porc Le cassoulet de Castelna... vs Cassoulet au porc Cassoulet de castelnauda... vs Cassoulet au porc Cassoulet de Castelnauda... vs Cassoulet de castelnauda... Cassoulet de Castelnauda... vs Cassoulet de castelnauda... Cassoulet de Castelnauda... vs Cassoulet de castelnauda... Cassoulet de castelnauda... vs Cassoulet de castelnauda... Le cassoulet de Castelna... vs Cassoulet de castelnauda...