Comparison

Cassoulet de Castelnaudary vs Cassoulet au porc

Overall, Cassoulet au porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCassoulet de CastelnaudaryCassoulet au porc
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group — —
Calories 145 kcal 127 kcal
Fat 7 g 5.5 g
Saturated fat 2.6 g 1.9 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.7 g
Salt 0.8 g 0.8 g
Fiber — 3.1 g
Protein 11 g 9.7 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cassoulet au porc has 12% fewer calories (127 kcal vs 145 kcal).
  • Cassoulet au porc has 21% less fat (5.5 g vs 7 g).
  • Cassoulet au porc has 27% less saturated fat (1.9 g vs 2.6 g).
  • Cassoulet de Castelnaudary has 12% more protein (11 g vs 9.7 g).
  • Cassoulet au porc has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Cassoulet de Castelnaudary

Not available.

Cassoulet au porc

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cassoulet de Castelnaudary or Cassoulet au porc?

Overall, Cassoulet au porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cassoulet au porc has fewer calories: 127 kcal versus 145 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cassoulet de Castelnaudary has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons