Cassoulet de Castelnaudary vs Cassoulet au porc
Overall, Cassoulet au porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cassoulet de Castelnaudary | Cassoulet au porc |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 145 kcal | 127 kcal |
| Fat | 7 g | 5.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.6 g | 1.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.1 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 9.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cassoulet au porc has 12% fewer calories (127 kcal vs 145 kcal).
- Cassoulet au porc has 21% less fat (5.5 g vs 7 g).
- Cassoulet au porc has 27% less saturated fat (1.9 g vs 2.6 g).
- Cassoulet de Castelnaudary has 12% more protein (11 g vs 9.7 g).
- Cassoulet au porc has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Cassoulet de Castelnaudary
Not available.
Cassoulet au porc
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cassoulet de Castelnaudary or Cassoulet au porc?
Overall, Cassoulet au porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cassoulet au porc has fewer calories: 127 kcal versus 145 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cassoulet de Castelnaudary has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.