Cassava Chips vs Organic Manioc Chips
Overall, Cassava Chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cassava Chips | Organic Manioc Chips |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 429 kcal | 498 kcal |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.6 g | 9.4 g |
| Sugars | 7.1 g | 1.1 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 10.7 g | 5.1 g |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 1.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cassava Chips has 14% fewer calories (429 kcal vs 498 kcal).
- Cassava Chips has 11% less fat (21.4 g vs 24 g).
- Cassava Chips has 62% less saturated fat (3.6 g vs 9.4 g).
- Organic Manioc Chips has 85% less sugar (1.1 g vs 7.1 g).
- Organic Manioc Chips has 37% less salt (0.6 g vs 1 g).
- Cassava Chips has 52% more fiber (10.7 g vs 5.1 g).
- Cassava Chips has 61% more protein (3.6 g vs 1.4 g).
- Cassava Chips has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Cassava Chips
Not available.
Organic Manioc Chips
manioc* (70 %), huile de graines de tournesol*, sel de mer (1,5 %)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cassava Chips or Organic Manioc Chips?
Overall, Cassava Chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cassava Chips has fewer calories: 429 kcal versus 498 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Organic Manioc Chips has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 7.1 g per 100 g.