Comparison

Cassava Chips vs Organic Manioc Chips

Overall, Cassava Chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCassava ChipsOrganic Manioc Chips
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group — 3
Calories 429 kcal 498 kcal
Fat 21.4 g 24 g
Saturated fat 3.6 g 9.4 g
Sugars 7.1 g 1.1 g
Salt 1 g 0.6 g
Fiber 10.7 g 5.1 g
Protein 3.6 g 1.4 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cassava Chips has 14% fewer calories (429 kcal vs 498 kcal).
  • Cassava Chips has 11% less fat (21.4 g vs 24 g).
  • Cassava Chips has 62% less saturated fat (3.6 g vs 9.4 g).
  • Organic Manioc Chips has 85% less sugar (1.1 g vs 7.1 g).
  • Organic Manioc Chips has 37% less salt (0.6 g vs 1 g).
  • Cassava Chips has 52% more fiber (10.7 g vs 5.1 g).
  • Cassava Chips has 61% more protein (3.6 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Cassava Chips has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Cassava Chips

Not available.

Organic Manioc Chips

manioc* (70 %), huile de graines de tournesol*, sel de mer (1,5 %)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cassava Chips or Organic Manioc Chips?

Overall, Cassava Chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cassava Chips has fewer calories: 429 kcal versus 498 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Organic Manioc Chips has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 7.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons