Cassava Chips vs Chips au Crabe
Overall, Cassava Chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cassava Chips | Chips au Crabe |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 429 kcal | 497 kcal |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 23.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.6 g | 2.1 g |
| Sugars | 7.1 g | 9.5 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | 10.7 g | — |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 1.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Crustaceans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cassava Chips has 14% fewer calories (429 kcal vs 497 kcal).
- Chips au Crabe has 42% less saturated fat (2.1 g vs 3.6 g).
- Cassava Chips has 25% less sugar (7.1 g vs 9.5 g).
- Cassava Chips has 46% less salt (1 g vs 1.9 g).
- Cassava Chips has 53% more protein (3.6 g vs 1.7 g).
- Cassava Chips has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Chips au Crabe lists: Crustaceans.
Ingredients
Cassava Chips
Not available.
Chips au Crabe
Fécule de manioc (49%), huile de tournesol, chair de crabe (10,3%), sucre, sel, ail, poivre, acidifiant (acide citrique), poudre à lever (carbonate acide de sodium)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cassava Chips or Chips au Crabe?
Overall, Cassava Chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cassava Chips has fewer calories: 429 kcal versus 497 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cassava Chips has less sugar: 7.1 g versus 9.5 g per 100 g.