Cashews Pikant vs Honig Macadamia
Overall, Cashews Pikant has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cashews Pikant | Honig Macadamia |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 606 kcal | 706 kcal |
| Fat | 48 g | 66.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 10 g | 11.1 g |
| Sugars | 5 g | 15.1 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 5.4 g | — |
| Protein | 21 g | 7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Celery, Gluten, Nuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cashews Pikant has 14% fewer calories (606 kcal vs 706 kcal).
- Cashews Pikant has 28% less fat (48 g vs 66.6 g).
- Cashews Pikant has 67% less sugar (5 g vs 15.1 g).
- Honig Macadamia has 72% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.9 g).
- Cashews Pikant has 67% more protein (21 g vs 7 g).
- Cashews Pikant has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Cashews Pikant lists: Celery, Gluten, Nuts.
Ingredients
Cashews Pikant
Cashewkerne, Speisesalz, Aroma, Weizenmehl, Zwiebel, Paprikaextrakt, Sellerieextrakt, Glukosesirup.
Honig Macadamia
Macadamianusskerne, Zucker, Sonnenblumenöl, Honig 2%, Salz, Glukosesirup, Geliermittel (Xanthan)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cashews Pikant or Honig Macadamia?
Overall, Cashews Pikant has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cashews Pikant has fewer calories: 606 kcal versus 706 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cashews Pikant has less sugar: 5 g versus 15.1 g per 100 g.