Cashews Pikant vs Hot Thai Cashews
Overall, Cashews Pikant has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cashews Pikant | Hot Thai Cashews |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 606 kcal | 628 kcal |
| Fat | 48 g | 50 g |
| Saturated fat | 10 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 5 g | 7.4 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 5.4 g | — |
| Protein | 21 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Celery, Gluten, Nuts | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cashews Pikant has 17% less saturated fat (10 g vs 12 g).
- Cashews Pikant has 32% less sugar (5 g vs 7.4 g).
- Hot Thai Cashews has 52% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.9 g).
- Only Cashews Pikant lists: Celery, Gluten.
Ingredients
Cashews Pikant
Cashewkerne, Speisesalz, Aroma, Weizenmehl, Zwiebel, Paprikaextrakt, Sellerieextrakt, Glukosesirup.
Hot Thai Cashews
Cashewkerne, Sonnenblumenöl, Zucker, Salz, natürliches Aroma, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure, 0,1% Paprikaextrakt.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cashews Pikant or Hot Thai Cashews?
Overall, Cashews Pikant has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cashews Pikant has fewer calories: 606 kcal versus 628 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cashews Pikant has less sugar: 5 g versus 7.4 g per 100 g.