Carpaccio grand cru de charal vs Hähncheninnenfilets
Overall, Hähncheninnenfilets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Carpaccio grand cru de chara... | Hähncheninnenfilets |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 233 kcal | 104 kcal |
| Fat | 16 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.8 g | 2.8 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Sesame seeds, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hähncheninnenfilets has 55% fewer calories (104 kcal vs 233 kcal).
- Hähncheninnenfilets has 89% less fat (1.8 g vs 16 g).
- Hähncheninnenfilets has no sugar, while Carpaccio grand cru de charal has 1.2 g.
- Hähncheninnenfilets is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Carpaccio grand cru de charal lists: Milk, Sesame seeds, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Carpaccio grand cru de charal
Carpaccio mariné 83,4% : viande bovine 92%, marinade épicée 8% (huile de colza, arômes, colorant : extrait de paprika). Dosette de marinade 8,3% (huile d'olive 50%, vinaigre balsamique 30% (vinaigre de vin, moût de raisin, colorant : caramel, _sulfites_), huile de colza, eau, vinaigre, graines de _sésame_ 3%, sel, arômes, dosettes de copeaux de parmesan (_lait_) 8,3%.
Hähncheninnenfilets
100 % Hähnchenfleisch
FAQ
Which is healthier: Carpaccio grand cru de charal or Hähncheninnenfilets?
Overall, Hähncheninnenfilets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hähncheninnenfilets has fewer calories: 104 kcal versus 233 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hähncheninnenfilets has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.