Carpaccio grand cru de charal vs Les Grignot' - Mini travers de porc nature
Overall, Carpaccio grand cru de charal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Carpaccio grand cru de charal
Les Grignot' - Mini travers de porc nature
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Carpaccio grand cru de chara... | Les Grignot' - Mini travers... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 233 kcal | 257 kcal |
| Fat | 16 g | 16.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.8 g | 6.8 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 1.9 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Sesame seeds, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Carpaccio grand cru de charal has 59% less saturated fat (2.8 g vs 6.8 g).
- Carpaccio grand cru de charal has 37% less sugar (1.2 g vs 1.9 g).
- Carpaccio grand cru de charal has 64% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.3 g).
- Les Grignot' - Mini travers de porc nature has 20% more protein (25 g vs 20 g).
- Carpaccio grand cru de charal has the better Nutri-Score.
- Les Grignot' - Mini travers de porc nature is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Carpaccio grand cru de charal lists: Milk, Sesame seeds, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Carpaccio grand cru de charal
Carpaccio mariné 83,4% : viande bovine 92%, marinade épicée 8% (huile de colza, arômes, colorant : extrait de paprika). Dosette de marinade 8,3% (huile d'olive 50%, vinaigre balsamique 30% (vinaigre de vin, moût de raisin, colorant : caramel, _sulfites_), huile de colza, eau, vinaigre, graines de _sésame_ 3%, sel, arômes, dosettes de copeaux de parmesan (_lait_) 8,3%.
Les Grignot' - Mini travers de porc nature
Travers de porc 95,6% - miel - sel de Guérande - poivre - ail.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Carpaccio grand cru de charal or Les Grignot' - Mini travers de porc nature?
Overall, Carpaccio grand cru de charal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Carpaccio grand cru de charal has fewer calories: 233 kcal versus 257 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Carpaccio grand cru de charal has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.