Carpaccio di polpo vs Polipetti alla Luciana
Overall, Carpaccio di polpo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Carpaccio di polpo | Polipetti alla Luciana |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 95 kcal | 212 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 13 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 2.4 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 3.6 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Carpaccio di polpo has 55% fewer calories (95 kcal vs 212 kcal).
- Carpaccio di polpo has 92% less fat (1 g vs 13 g).
- Carpaccio di polpo has 83% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 2.4 g).
- Carpaccio di polpo has 61% less sugar (1.4 g vs 3.6 g).
- Polipetti alla Luciana has no salt, while Carpaccio di polpo has 1.5 g.
- Polipetti alla Luciana has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Carpaccio di polpo
Not available.
Polipetti alla Luciana
Polpa di pomodoro 50%, POLPO indopacifico 40%, olive verdi, olio extravergine di oliva, vino bianco, olio di girasole, sale, aglio, prezzemolo
FAQ
Which is healthier: Carpaccio di polpo or Polipetti alla Luciana?
Overall, Carpaccio di polpo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Carpaccio di polpo has fewer calories: 95 kcal versus 212 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Carpaccio di polpo has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.