Carpaccio de saumon vs Salata cu icre de Crap si ceapa
Overall, Carpaccio de saumon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Carpaccio de saumon | Salata cu icre de Crap si ce... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 292 kcal | 558 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 60 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.1 g | 4.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 4.5 g | 1.6 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 2.8 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Carpaccio de saumon has 48% fewer calories (292 kcal vs 558 kcal).
- Carpaccio de saumon has 60% less fat (24 g vs 60 g).
- Carpaccio de saumon has 31% less saturated fat (3.1 g vs 4.5 g).
- Salata cu icre de Crap si ceapa has 64% less salt (1.6 g vs 4.5 g).
- Carpaccio de saumon has 100% more fiber (0.6 g vs 0 g).
- Carpaccio de saumon has 84% more protein (18 g vs 2.8 g).
- Salata cu icre de Crap si ceapa has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Carpaccio de saumon lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Carpaccio de saumon
Saumon atlantique (Salmo salar, élevé en Norvège) 82%, marinade 12% (huile d'olive vierge extra 6%, huile de colza, extrait de citron 0,27%, sel, basilic, poivre), sel, sucre, conservateur: vinaigre tamponné, épices, fenouil.
Salata cu icre de Crap si ceapa
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Carpaccio de saumon or Salata cu icre de Crap si ceapa?
Overall, Carpaccio de saumon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Carpaccio de saumon has fewer calories: 292 kcal versus 558 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salata cu icre de Crap si ceapa has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.