Nixe vs Carpaccio de saumon
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Nixe | Carpaccio de saumon |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 370 kcal | 292 kcal |
| Fat | 33 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 5 g | 3.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 4.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Carpaccio de saumon has 21% fewer calories (292 kcal vs 370 kcal).
- Carpaccio de saumon has 27% less fat (24 g vs 33 g).
- Carpaccio de saumon has 38% less saturated fat (3.1 g vs 5 g).
- Nixe has 83% less salt (0.8 g vs 4.5 g).
- Nixe has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Carpaccio de saumon lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Nixe
Tuna fillets, 32% extra virgin olive oil, salt.
Carpaccio de saumon
Saumon atlantique (Salmo salar, élevé en Norvège) 82%, marinade 12% (huile d'olive vierge extra 6%, huile de colza, extrait de citron 0,27%, sel, basilic, poivre), sel, sucre, conservateur: vinaigre tamponné, épices, fenouil.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Nixe or Carpaccio de saumon?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Carpaccio de saumon has fewer calories: 292 kcal versus 370 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nixe has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.